:INFO Link in Bio vs Website: Which Gets You Found Faster Most arguments about link in bio vs website come down to easy versus annoying: four minutes to set up a Linktree, or a weekend wrestling with a real site. That framing skips the only thing that decides whether a stranger ever finds you. Two questions settle it. Can Google read the page, and do you keep what the page earns? For sending the followers you already have somewhere tidy, a bio tool wins. For getting discovered cold, it barely competes. | :INFO [links:https://developers.google.com/search/docs/fundamentals/seo-starter-guide] What Google Sees When It Visits Open a typical bio page and there is a name, an avatar, and eight buttons. That is the whole document. No title describing what you do, no heading, no paragraph, no alt text on the image. The crawler arrives, reads what is there, and leaves with an empty basket. | :CHECKLIST What the crawler found on the bio page [ ] A title that says what you do [ ] One real heading [ ] A sentence of actual text [ ] Alt text on the photo [ ] A phrase a stranger would type | :NOTE Google can load that page perfectly well. It simply has nothing to rank you for. A pottery teacher in Bristol can run a flawless Linktree and still never appear for "beginner wheel throwing classes Bristol", because the page never says any of those words. | :QUOTE [quotetype:personal] A page a crawler can read but cannot rank is still invisible. | :INFO One Page of Honest Writing A page with actual copy plays a different game. Give it a clear title, one real heading, two paragraphs naming the thing you offer, and a labelled photo, and now there is something a search query can match. One potter running weekend wheel classes went from invisible to second result for their town's search in about two months, off a single page of plain writing. Their old bio link never moved. Same year, two very different shapes. | :JOURNEY A Bio Link's First Year 2 The launch tap 1 Flat 1 Still flat 1 Day one again | :JOURNEY A Crawlable Page's First Year 1 Indexed and quiet 3 First real queries 4 Ranking settles 5 Compounding | :INFO [links:https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/site-move-with-url-changes] The Part Nobody Mentions: You Are Renting There is a slower cost underneath all this. On most bio tools the URL belongs to them, so whatever authority that link earns flows back to their root domain, not yours. The whole difference fits in the address bar. | :PATH linktr.ee/yourname Their domain, their authority, their off switch | :PATH yourname.com Your domain, your authority, yours when you switch tools :NOTE Switch tools or let the subscription lapse and the page dies, taking every backlink anyone ever gave it. Months spent pointing people at an address you never owned, and no way to forward what it built. | :INFO An Owned Page Keeps Earning Publish on your own domain, or on one that lets you attach a custom domain, and the effort accrues to you instead. Links pile up, the page keeps working, and the thing you put out last spring is still pulling traffic this spring. | :DURATION 2025-04-01T00:00:00Z 2026-04-01T00:00:00Z | :NOTE One page, twelve months, no reposting and no algorithm to keep fed. A bio link tends to flatline the day you make it. An owned, crawlable page can keep climbing long after you stopped thinking about it. | :INFO Pick by the Job Keep a bio link for what it is genuinely good at: a tidy menu for people already standing on your profile. Reach for a real indexed page when you want people who have never heard of you to land on you through search. Most creators end up running both, with the searchable page doing the finding. | :THREAD | :INFO Bio-Link Speed Without Going Invisible The gap between the two is setup time, and that is the gap a Slatesource slate fills. One page that publishes with a proper title, real headings, and crawlable text, where chips like an Info card for your service or a Timeline for your class dates carry words a search engine can read. You get found, and the page stays yours.