Slatesource
PrivacyTerms© 2026 Slatesource
Kepler-186 f: 5-Planet System, 0.432 AU Out

Kepler-186 f: 5-Planet System, 0.432 AU Out

Terrestrial around Kepler-186

It is 1.17 times Earth's radius, closest in size to Earth. A year there lasts 129.94 days, on an orbit 1.1 times Mercury's distance from the Sun. Its equilibrium temperature is 182 K (derived from the star rather than measured), colder than anywhere on Earth. The host star Kepler-186 runs at 3755 K with 0.54 times the Sun's mass.

journey·5 Planets

Kepler-186 from the inside out

Orbit

/

Planet

Kepler-186 bKepler-186 cKepler-186 dKepler-186 eKepler-186 f (this one)12345
terrestrial, 620 K.
super-Earth, 541 K.
super-Earth, 411 K.
super-Earth, 346 K.
terrestrial, 182 K.

The habitability checklist, honestly scored

0%

On the edge of the habitable zone. Borderline.

A measured mass, not just a radius. No.

A measured temperature rather than one derived from the star. No.

Any detection of an atmosphere. Not recorded in the archive.

Radius

1.17 Earth radii

Equilibrium temperature

182 K (derived)

One year

129.94 days

Orbit radius

0.4320 AU

Host star

Kepler-186 at 3755 K

Distance

579 light-years

Starlight blocked

0.042% at each transit

What a crossing measures

Block a known fraction of a known star and you have measured a width.

The archive lists no measured equilibrium temperature for this planet. The 182 K quoted here is derived from the star's output and the orbital distance, assuming a third of the light is reflected. It is an estimate from two numbers, not an observation.

Found by Kepler in 2014. Kepler watched a single field continuously, so it found the planets that come round often. A world with a long year simply never repeated within the mission.

The detection is a shadow crossing a disc. Shadows have no weight, which is the whole reason the mass column is empty.

Kepler-186 has 5 known planets. Multi-planet systems are where orbital dynamics can be measured rather than assumed.

Half the temperatures quoted for exoplanets are calculated from the star, not \

measured at the planet. Should a page like this show them at all, or leave the field blank?

No comments yet. Be the first.
Log in to comment